Mediation News

A Consumer Guide to Selecting a Mediator

This guide was developed (by the Alaska State Judicial Council) under a grant (#SJI-94-03E-H-284) from the State Justice Institute. The points of view expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the State Justice Institute (or the Department of the Navy). The Judicial Council would like to express its appreciation to the many people who contributed to this project. Thanks to all who gave so freely of their expertise and time and exhibited such support and enthusiasm for the project. You also may wish to refer to a Directory of Mediators in Alaska published by the Alaska Court System.

To make an informed choice of a mediator the consumer must have information and the ability to evaluate that information. This guide begins the educational process by presenting a framework for understanding mediator competence. The information is based on research presented at the 1993 National Symposium on Court-Connected Dispute Resolution Research sponsored by the State Justice Institute and the National Center for State Courts, the ongoing work of the Test Design Project, the work of alternate dispute resolution policy makers, and the experience of mediators and mediation program directors nationwide. We anticipate that the guide will need to be updated as our knowledge grows.

Please send us an e-mail message with comments, suggestions or requests for written copies of this guide. Read more at

If you decide to retain a mediator in Indiana and begin the mediation process, Contact our Indiana Mediaton Lawyer now!

	Did You Know?
	Mediation may not be the most appropriate avenue for resolution in all cases. For example, it may not be appropriate in cases where: A definitive or authoritative resolution of the matter is required; The matter involves or may bear upon significant questions of Government policy that require additional procedures before a final resolution may be made; Maintaining established policies that apply to many people is especially important; The matter significantly affects persons or groups who are not parties to the process; A full public record of the proceeding is important; or The agency must maintain continuing jurisdiction over the matter with authority to alter the disposition of the matter in light of changed circumstances.